MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114215374 · doi:10.2514/6.2009-2634

Ground Characterisation of Tape-Spring Deployment Mechanism

2009· article· en· W2114215374 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpring (device)Software deploymentMechanism (biology)Computer scienceGeologyEngineeringPhysicsMechanical engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a ground investigation into the properties of a tape-spring hinge mechanism, for use in deploying a multi-layer membrane structure for space antenna applications. The repeatability results of deploying those membrane layers using this mechanism are explored, as well as the flatness expected of the surfaces deployed for signal transmission and reception. This membrane is a prototype for the development of an on-orbit flight experiment in thin structure deployment, where such an experiment addresses necessary questions related to the use of this technology for membrane synthetic aperture radar. The prototype includes multiple layers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it