MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The effects of photothermal manipulation on reproductive development in female haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus L.

2004· article· en· W2114219308 on OpenAlex
Deborah J Martin-Robichaud, David L. Berlinsky

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAquaculture Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsHaddockBiologyphotoperiodismFish <Actinopterygii>AquacultureFisheryZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus L.) were maintained on either simulated natural (SNP) or advanced, phase-shifted photoperiods (ADV) and reproductive characteristics of female fish were measured throughout two reproductive cycles. By advancing the seasonal photoperiod 8 weeks, relative to ambient conditions, follicle development, peak levels of estradiol and initiation of spawning were all accelerated compared with fish maintained on an SNP. Profiles of steroid synthesis and follicular development were similar between the two groups but the spawning period was protracted by 40 days in the fish maintained on ADV. Ultrasound imaging proved to be an effective and non-invasive tool for accurately assessing ovarian development throughout the reproductive cycle. These results suggest that photoperiod manipulation has significant potential for extending the availability of eggs and larvae for haddock aquaculture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it