Length of Chain in Pyramidal Firms towards Expropriation of Minority Interest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is documented that there is a large divergence of cash flow rights and control rights in ownership concentrated corporations whereby power lies in the hands of the ultimate controlling shareholder especially for Malaysian pyramidal firms. The divergence of these two rights via length of chain leads to the expropriation of minority shareholders interest. Thus, this study aims to examine the factors influencing the length of chain of Malaysian pyramidal firms implying expropriation of minority interest. This study hypothesizes that the distance separating the ultimate controlling shareholder from their affiliated firms is positively related to the presence of eventual negative shocks and vice-versa. Applying the Attig Model and Panel Generalised Least Square (GLS) estimation on Malaysian pyramidal firms between 1990 to 2010 as the underlying statistical test, the results show that there is association between the length of chain separating ultimate controlling shareholder from the affiliated groups and the entrenchment effect. Factors influencing the length of chain such as risk, cash, size, TobinQ, duality, financial institution and liquidity posit significant results and consistent with the entrenchment effect. Future research needs to highlight on identifying the heterogeneous factors that improve the generalizability of research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".