MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114300197 · doi:10.1095/biolreprod.104.029371

Pre-Sertoli Specific Gene Expression Profiling Reveals Differential Expression of Ppt1 and Brd3 Genes Within the Mouse Genital Ridge at the Time of Sex Determination1

2004· article· en· W2114300197 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre Boyer, Jacques G. Lussier, Andrew Sinclair, Peter J. McClive, David W. Silversides

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCegep de Saint Hyacinthe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTestis determining factorGonadal ridgeSertoli cellFGF9Molecular biologyIn situ hybridizationGene expressionGeneCell biologyGeneticsY chromosomeSpermatogenesisEndocrinologyEmbryogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In mammals, testis determination is initiated when the SRY gene is expressed in pre-Sertoli cells of the undifferentiated genital ridge. SRY directs the differentiation of these cells into Sertoli cells and initiates the testis differentiation pathway via currently ill-defined mechanisms. Because Sertoli cells are the first somatic cells to differentiate within the developing testis, it is likely that the signals for orchestrating testis determination are expressed within pre-Sertoli cells. We have previously generated a transgenic mouse line that expresses green fluorescent protein under the control of the pig SRY promoter, thus marking pre-Sertoli cells via fluorescence. We have now used suppression-subtractive hybridization (SSH) to construct a normalized cDNA library derived from fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) purified pre-Sertoli cells taken from 12.0 to 12.5 days postcoitum (dpc) fetal transgenic mouse testes. A total of 35 candidate cDNAs for known genes were identified. Detection of Sf1, a gene known for its role in sex determination as well as Vanin-1, Vcp1, Sparc, and Aldh3a1, four genes previously identified in differential screens as gene overexpressed in developing testis compared with ovary, support the biological validity of our experimental model. Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed on the 35 candidate genes for qualitative differential expression between male and female genital ridges; six were upregulated in the testis and one was upregulated in the ovary. The expression pattern of two genes, Ppt1 and Brd3, were examined in further detail. We conclude that combining transgenically marked fluorescent cell populations with differential expression screening is useful for cell expression profiling in developmental systems such as sex determination and differentiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207