MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114315687 · doi:10.1177/0954406211428012

Transmission of vibration and energy through layered and jointed plates subjected to shock excitation

2011· article· en· W2114315687 on OpenAlexaff
Huifang Xiao, Yimin Shao, Chris K. Mechefske

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBladed Disk Vibration Dynamics
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplitudeVibrationShock (circulatory)AccelerationTransmission (telecommunications)AttenuationEnergy (signal processing)AcousticsExcitationMaterials scienceMechanicsPhysicsStructural engineeringOpticsClassical mechanicsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, the vibration and energy transmission characteristics at the multiple interfaces of layered and jointed plates associated with friction are studied as a function of the shock loading amplitude using the established ‘sphere-joint assembled multi-layered plates’ model. The dynamic responses at the multiple interfaces under shock excitation are calculated using finite element analysis. The transmissions of vibration and energy through the multiple interfaces are characterized by the defined vibration and energy transmission ratios. Results show that the acceleration amplitudes at different interfaces increase nonlinearly with the shock amplitude and they are approximated by a third-order polynomial function. The acceleration amplitude nonlinearly decreases along the transmitting interfaces and the maximum attenuation occurs between the first and second transmitting interfaces. A minimum vibration transmission ratio is observed for the range of shock amplitude considered and the value of shock amplitude leading to the minimum is identical for different transmitting interfaces. It is also shown that the energy transmission ratio exhibits a nonlinear behaviour similar to that of the vibration transmission ratio. The expression for determining the shock amplitude resulting in peak energy transmission ratio at the input interface is also presented. Experimental validation is performed, which shows good agreement with numerical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering ScienceSame topicBladed Disk Vibration DynamicsFrench-language works237,207