MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114345510 · doi:10.1109/cnsr.2011.21

Tuning Open-iSCSI for Operation over WAN Links

2011· article· en· W2114345510 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Zhang, M.H. MacGregor

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Storage Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsiSCSIComputer scienceThroughputComputer networkSCSIOperating systemComputer data storageWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relocation of live, running virtual machines from one physical host to another is a new and very desirable function because it provides a variety of features, including resilience to failures and flexibility of location. The data transfers required for live migration are supported in several commercial products by a protocol called iSCSI (Internet SCSI), which runs on top of TCP. We thoroughly tested the performance of a common open source component, the Open-iSCSI initiator, and found a drastic throughput degradation on 100 Mbps networks where the round trip time was more than about 40 ms. We localized the problem to the TCP send buffer size and tested two methods of setting the TCP send buffer size appropriately. Based on our results, we propose a performance tuning scheme that enables users of Open-iSCSI to achieve significant throughput gains. Our scheme results in a dramatic throughput jump from 14 Mbps to 70 Mbps on a 100 Mbps link with an RTT of 100 ms. We also modified one of the data structures internal to Open-iSCSI to handle multiple memory pages in a single scatter/gather list entry. This modification resulted in an additional 20% throughput increase on a 100 Mbps link with an RTT of 200 ms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Storage TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207