MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114390535 · doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-760-8_76

Detection of the Aleutian mink disease virus DNA and antiviral antibodies in experimentally infected mink 10 days post-inoculation

2012· book-chapter· en· W2114390535 on OpenAlexaff
A. Farid, Irshad Hussain, P.P. Rupasinghe

Bibliographic record

VenueWageningen Academic Publishers eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Department of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinkVirologyInoculationAntibodyVirusBiologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Black (n=44) and sapphire (n=12) mink were injected intraperitoneally with 10% spleen homogenates containing a local strain of the Aleutian mink disease virus (AMDV). Animals were euthanized 10 days post-inoculation (pi) and samples of blood and seven organs were collected. Viral DNA was extracted from blood plasma and cell-free organ homogenates (25% W/V) by magnetic beads and tested by PCR. Anti-viral antibodies in blood plasma were tested by counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIEP). The virus was present in the spleen, lymph nodes, bone marrow and lung samples of all inoculated mink, but was not detected in some intestine (1.9%), kidney (10.7%) and liver (35.7%) samples. Viral DNA was detected in plasma of all inoculated mink by PCR, although two of the samples showed inconclusive test results. Antiviral antibodies were detected in plasma of three sapphire (25.0%) and 19 black (43.2%) mink. The relative specificity and sensitivity of the CIEP test on plasma samples were 100% and 39.3%, respectively, implying that low levels of antibodies during early stages of infection resulted in false negative CIEP tests. Histopathology revealed some lesions characteristics of AMDV infection in the liver and/or kidneys of three black and one sapphire mink, but heart and lung tissues had no detectible lesions. The results suggested that PCR was more reliable than CIEP for viral detection in the early period after infection, and that there were considerable differences among mink of each color type for production of detectable levels of anti-viral antibodies and development of disease symptoms. Samples of saliva, rectal swabs and feces collected on day 10 pi did not produce consistent and reliable results for viral detection by PCR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWageningen Academic Publishers eBooksSame topicVirus-based gene therapy researchFrench-language works237,207