Cómo los padres canadienses de clase media alta conceptualizan la transmisión de ventajas a sus hijos
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By means of 42 interviews applied to upper-middle-class Canadian parents, this research project examines the way they understand the transmission of advantages,and how such understanding shapes their children´s upbringing. The author\nfinds out that these parents do not consider economic capital as the most important resource, nor they stress the importance of seeking a higher cultural status. On the contrary, they emphasize the importance of exposing their children to new and\ndiverse experiences and cultures, supporting the kids interests, and being good models to them. According to these parents, this approach not only promotes broader and more cosmopolitan cultural competences, but also develops character. Economic\nresources are perceived as a consequence, since they allow parents to encourage the development of such qualities and values. The author sets these findings in an educational context in Canada, and concludes her article by questioning the potentially post-materialist and cultural origin of the interviewees understanding of social reproduction processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it