MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114395941 · doi:10.1139/p02-045

Potential curves and rovibrational energies for electronic states of the molecular ion KCs<sup>+</sup>

2002· article· en· W2114395941 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mahmoud Korek, A. Allouche, Saleh N. Abdul Al

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRotational–vibrational spectroscopyPhysicsAtomic physicsAb initioDipolePotential energyIonPseudopotentialQuantum mechanicsExcited state

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The KCs + molecular ion potential curves are investigated over a wide range of internuclear distance for electronic states described in a 2 Λ (+) representation (neglecting the spin-orbit effect) as well as in an Ω (+) representation (including the spin-orbit effect). This calculation has been done in a one active electron approach by using an ab initio method based on non-empirical pseudopotentials with core-valence effect taken into account through parameterized l-dependent polarization potentials. Gaussian basis sets have been used for both atoms, and spin-orbit effects have been taken into account through a semiempirical spin-orbit pseudopotential. The canonical functions approach is used to do a rovibrational study by calculating the eigenvalues E v , the rotational constant B v , the centrifugal distortion constants D v (up to 106 vibrational levels), and the spectroscopic constants are deduced for six bound states. The permanent and transition dipole moment functions have been derived for transitions between the bound states 2 Σ + and 2 Π as well as the oscillator strengths for the transitions v = 0, 10, 20, and Δ v = 0, 1, 2, ..., 6. To the best of our knowledge neither theoretical nor experimental data are available in the literature for the molecular ion KCs + . Extensive tables of E v , B v , D v , and the energy values versus internuclear distance are displayed at the following address: http://hplasim2.univ-lyon1.fr/allouche/kcsplus.html. PACS Nos.: 33.15Dj, 33.20wr

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207