MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114405497 · doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12267

Mode‐converted volcanogenic massive sulphide ore lens reflections in vertical seismic profiles from Flin Flon, Manitoba, Canada

2015· article· en· W2114405497 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dave Melanson, Don White, C. Samson, Gilles Bellefleur, Ernst Schetselaar, Douglas R. Schmitt

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Prospecting · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaCarleton UniversityGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeismologyVertical seismic profileGemologyDynamiteMode (computer interface)PetrologyMineralogyVolcanismEngineering geology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT In October 2006, three‐component zero‐offset vertical seismic profile data were acquired from a deviated well in the Flin Flon mining camp in Manitoba, Canada, using a dynamite source. These vertical seismic profile data were processed to reveal reflections originating from the 85.5 Mt Flin Flon‐Callinan‐777 volcanogenic massive sulphide ore system. From drill records, mine plans, surficial maps, and seismic data, 3D voxel models of the local geology and known ore zones were built, which were then used in 3D finite‐difference modelled simulations of the vertical seismic profile surveys. The number of geological units partitioning the model was incrementally increased to study the effects of the massive sulphide ore and the major rock units on the seismic response. The simulations and field data were jointly visualized, and reflections originating at some of the known ore zones were identified. These reflections were observed in each of the three components in both the real field and the forward modelled data and indicate a strong mode‐converted component of the reflected wavefield.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.845

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical ProspectingSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207