MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114443964 · doi:10.1017/s0305004109990375

Sets of zero discrete harmonic density

2009· article· en· W2114443964 on OpenAlexaff
Colin C. Graham, Kathryn E. Hare

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topology and Set Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDual polyhedronZero (linguistics)MathematicsAbelian groupGroup (periodic table)HarmonicDiscrete groupOpen setCombinatoricsSet (abstract data type)Discrete mathematicsPure mathematicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let G be a compact, connected, abelian group with dual group Γ. The set E ⊂ has zero discrete harmonic density (z.d.h.d.) if for every open U ⊂ G and μ ∈ M d ( G ) there exists ν ∈ M d ( U ) with = on E . I 0 sets in the duals of these groups have z.d.h.d. We give properties of such sets, exhibit non-Sidon sets having z.d.h.d., and prove union theorems. In particular, we prove that unions of I 0 sets have z.d.h.d. and provide a new approach to two long-standing problems involving Sidon sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical SocietySame topicAdvanced Topology and Set TheoryFrench-language works237,207