A Double-Blind, Adjuvant-Controlled Trial of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Immunogen (Remune) Monotherapy in Asymptomatic, HIV-1-Infected Thai Subjects with CD4-Cell Counts of >300
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined the effect of a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific immune-based therapy in Thailand, where access to antiviral drug therapy is limited. A 40-week trial was conducted with 297 asymptomatic, HIV-infected Thai subjects with CD4-cell counts greater than 300 microl/mm(3). Subjects were randomized to receive either HIV type 1 (HIV-1) immunogen (Remune; inactivated HIV-1 from which gp120 is depleted in incomplete Freund's adjuvant or adjuvant control at 0, 12, 24, and 36 weeks at five different clinical sites in Thailand. Neither group received antiviral drug therapy. The a priori primary endpoint for the trial was changes in CD4-cell counts with secondary parameters of percent changes in CD8-cell counts (percent CD4, CD8, and CD4/CD8) and body weight. Subsets of subjects were also examined for changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, Western blot immunoreactivity, and HIV-1 delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin test reactivity. There was a significant difference in changes in CD4-cell counts that favored the HIV-1 immunogen-treated group compared to those for the adjuvant-treated control group (P<0.05). On average, for HIV-1 immunogen-treated subjects CD4-cell counts increased by 84 cells by week 40, whereas the increase for the control group was 38 cells by week 40. This increase in CD4-cell count was associated with increased HIV-specific immunogenicity, as shown by Western blotting and enhanced HIV-1 DTH skin reactivity. No significant differences in adverse events were observed between the groups. The results of this trial suggest that HIV-1 immunogen is safe and significantly increases CD4-cell counts and HIV-specific immunity compared to those achieved with the adjuvant control in asymptomatic HIV-1-infected subjects not taking antiviral drugs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".