MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114466065 · doi:10.1149/05309.0011ecst

Comparison of Novel Anode Materials for the Production of Hydrogen Using CuCl/HCl Electrolyzers

2013· article· en· W2114466065 on OpenAlex
Patrick S. R. Edge, E. Bradley Easton

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolysisThermogravimetric analysisSilaneCyclic voltammetryDielectric spectroscopyMaterials scienceElectrochemistryScanning electron microscopeEthylenediamineHydrogen productionAnodeCarbon blackChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryElectrodeChemistryHydrogenComposite materialOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ceramic carbon electrodes (CCE) were prepared via the sol-gel method using Vulcan XC-72 carbon black and N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine (2N). Each 2N-based CCE was characterized using thermogravimetric analysis scanning electron microscopy, cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. It was determined that increasing the loading of 2N-silane leads to an increase in both ionic conductivity as well as the electrochemically available surface area. However, highest CuCl/HCl electrolysis performance was achieved at lower 2N-silane loading, indicating that electrode pore structure may play a vital role in electrolysis performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it