MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114488196 · doi:10.5539/jgg.v5n2p18

Determination of the Aquifer System of the Northern Sector of Bida Basin, Nigeria Using Electrical Resistivity Method

2013· article· en· W2114488196 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdullahi Idris-Nda, M. I. Ogunbajo, P. I. Olasehinde

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geography and Geology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAquiferGeologyIronstoneVertical electrical soundingStructural basinBasementSiltstoneGroup (periodic table)GeomorphologyDepth soundingSedimentary rockGeochemistryGroundwaterGeotechnical engineeringGeographyFacies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The northern sector of the Bida Basin extends from Gulu in the south to Kontagora in the north, where it contacts the crystalline rock of the Basement Complex system. It lies between latitudes 5o80' and 10o50' N and longitudes 4o50' and 7o00' E. The Basin consists of Maastrichtian sedimentary deposits comprising of the Bida Sandstone, Sakpe Ironstone, Enagi Siltstone and Batati Ironstone Formations, with a total sedimentary pile of between 3500 to 4500 m. The aquifer is composed mainly of coarse to medium grained sandstone. Geoelectric survey was conducted using the Schlumberger configuration to a total AB/2 separation of 300 m. 140 Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) points were established along nine profiles spread across the Basin. The resulting curves were interpreted both qualitatively and quantitatively using visual inspection of the field curve, curve fitting using standard master and subsidiary curves as well as by computer iteration (Interpex IX1D). The results indicate that the dominant curve types are the AA, QQH and KQ. Four groups of curve types were obtained in the Basin, Group 1 (H, K), Group 2 (A, AA, KHK), Group 3 (HK, HKQ, KHKQ, KHKHK, QQH) and Group 4 (QHK, KQQ, KQ, QHK, Q). Based on these four groups the Basin was divided into a northern, central and southern sectors as well as geological contact areas. Geoelectric sections, developed from geoelectric logs show that three types of aquifers exist at various depths; a perched aquifer with a depth of between 5 to 20 m, a semi confined / confined aquifer at between 30 to 60m and an unconfined aquifer with undetermined thickness. The topsoil has a resistivity range of 50-500 Ohm-meters, ferruginised sandstone, 800-2000 Ohm-meters, sandy clay, 150-500 Ohm-meters, sandstone 300-1500 Ohm-meters and clay/shale, 10 to 100 Ohm-meters. The aquifer is represented by the sandstone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geography and GeologySame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207