L’histoire des autochtones d’Amérique du Nord: acquis et tendances
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Voici la première grande synthèse de l’histoire des Amérindiens établis au nord du Mexique, et ce, des origines à nos jours. Certes, nous disposions jusqu’alors d’un grand nombre d’études portant sur des nations, des aires culturelles, des périodes spécifiques, etc., mais aucune analyse d’ensemble n’avait ambitionné pareil dessein, l’étude des populations dans leurs rapports avec les Espagnols, les Français, les Hollandais, les Anglais, les Russes et les Danois. La Cambridge History pallie cette lacune en nous présentant une synthèse du savoir, par thèmes et par régions, qui compte près de mille pages en deux tomes et quinze chapitres, tous suivis d’un essai bibliographique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.053 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it