Side Chain Effect on Ion Channel Characters of Aib Rich Peptides
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As models of ion channel proteins and naturally occurring pore-forming peptides, we designed a series of Aib rich peptides [Ac-(Aib-Xxx-Aib-Ala)(5)-NH(2) (Xxx = Lys, Glu, Ser, and Gly: BXBA-20)] to investigate the effects of the side chains of the amino acid residues Lys, Glu, Ser, and Gly on the conformation and electrophysiological properties of ion channels. The conformation of peptides and their affinity for phospholipid membranes were evaluated by CD spectroscopy. Patch-clamp experiments revealed that all BXBA-20 peptides form ion channels in DPhPC bilayers exhibiting clearly resolved transitions between the open and closed states. The channel forming frequency was in the order BKBA-20>BEBA-20>BSBA-20>BGBA-20. In the case of BKBA-20 and BEBA-20, the self-assembled conductive oligomers expressed homogeneous and voltage-independent single channel conductances. In contrast, heterogeneous conductance was observed in BSBA-20 and BGBA-20 ion channels under similar experimental conditions. From these results, we conclude that peptides with a high degree of helical conformation, high amphipathicity, high affinity for lipid membranes, and self-associating characters in vesicles are most suitable for inducing ion channels with a high frequency of occurrence. Moreover, BEBA-20, BSBA-20, and BGBA-20 channels were cation-selective, whereas the BKBA-20 channel was non-selective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it