MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114519351 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2007.110

Neural Networks for Color Image Segmentation: Application to Sapwood Assessment

2007· article· en· W2114519351 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicWood and Agarwood Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersUniversité Laval
KeywordsArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceProcess (computing)Computer scienceMapleSegmentationImage segmentationDeep neural networksImage (mathematics)Computer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Botany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a method for detecting sapwood in hard wood such as cherry and maple. In the wood industry most applications need aesthetical boards. Thus the sapwood area on the board has to be detected as a defect region and be removed. To achieve this process, we classify the regions of the wood into two groups, by using neural networks techniques: sapwood is classified as a defect region while heartwood is considered as a good region. The use of neural networks by properly tuning the input vector provides a high defect detection rate with a low false positive rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWood and Agarwood ResearchFrench-language works237,207