MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114545002 · doi:10.1139/cjm-47-4-283

The panmictic nature of <i>Neisseria meningitidis</i> serogroup B during a period of endemic disease in Canada

2001· article· en· W2114545002 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
F. E. Ashton, Dominique A. Caugant

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsCanadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerotypeNeisseria meningitidisBiologyMicrobiologyGenetic diversityNeisseriaceaeGenotypeMeningococcal diseaseVirologyBacteriaGeneticsAntibioticsPopulationGeneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three hundred and one (301) strains of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B, isolated from patients with meningococcal disease during the years 1994-1996, were subjected to multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, serotyping, and serosubtyping. Based on the analyses of 14 enzyme loci, 177 electrophoretic types (ETs) were identified. Of these, 136 were represented by single isolates and 41 were represented by multiple isolates (range 2-31). The mean genetic diversity for isolates was 0.444 and for ETs was 0.440. The index of association (I(A)) between loci was 0.530 +/- 0.08 for isolates and 0.256 +/- 0.10 for ETs. Cluster analysis revealed the presence of 39 lineages each represented by a single ET or clusters of ETs. The most common serotypes were 4, 15, and 14 and accounted for 84 (28.0%), 53 (17.6%), and 32 (10.6%) of the isolates, respectively, and were dispersed amongst 46 ETs (1-122), 35 ETs (3-165), and 26 ETs (18-76), respectively. The 109 (36.6%) nontypable (NT) isolates were amongst 74 ETs (6-177). The mean genetic diversity for serotypes 4, 15, and 14 and NT isolates was 0.368, 0.371, 0.343, and 0.442, respectively, and for ETs was 0.363, 0.354, 0.397, and 0.440, respectively. Combinations of serotypes and serosubtypes (number of isolates) that occurred most frequently were 4:P1.14 (17), 14:P1.16 (16), NT:P1.16 (16), 15:P1.16 (13), and NT:P1.13 (13). The majority of group B disease in Canada during 1994-1996 was caused by meningococci of considerable genetic diversity, and reflects a situation of endemic disease. However, the results also indicate that organisms belonging to the ET-5 complex, which has been responsible for outbreaks of group B disease globally for several decades, have been introduced into the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicBacterial Infections and VaccinesFrench-language works237,207