MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Review of dialysate calcium concentration in hemodialysis

2006· review· en· W2114548004 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nigel D. Toussaint, Patrick Cooney, Peter G. Kerr

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHemodialysisDialysisCalciumCalciphylaxisInternal medicineVitamin D and neurologySecondary hyperparathyroidismParathyroid hormoneHyperparathyroidismEndocrinologyMetastatic calcificationCardiologyCalcificationUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dialysate calcium (Ca) concentration for hemodialysis (HD) patients can be adjusted to manage more optimally the body's Ca and phosphate balance, and thus improve bone metabolism as well as reduce accelerated arteriosclerosis and cardiovascular mortality. The appropriate dialysate Ca concentration allowing this balance should be prescribed to each individual patient depending on a multitude of variable factors relating to Ca load. A lower dialysate Ca concentration of 1.25 to 1.3 mmol/L will permit the use of vitamin D supplements and Ca-based phosphate binders in clinical practice, with much less risk of Ca loading and resultant hypercalcemia and calcification. Low Ca baths are useful in the setting of adynamic bone disease where an increase in bone turnover is required. However, low Ca levels in the dialysate may also predispose to cardiac arrhythmias and hemodynamically unstable dialysis sessions with intradialytic hypotension. Higher Ca dialysate is useful to sustain normal serum Ca levels where patients are not taking Ca-based binders or if Ca supplements are not able to normalize serum levels. Suppression of hyperparathyroidism is also effective with dialysate Ca of 1.75 mmol/L, but hypercalcemia, metastatic calcification, and oversuppression of parathyroid hormone are risks. Dialysate Ca of 1.5 mmol/L may be a compromise between bone protection and reduction in cardiovascular risk for conventional HD and is a common concentration used throughout the world. The increase in longer, more frequent dialysis such as short-daily and nocturnal HD, however, provides another challenge with regard to optimal dialysate Ca levels and higher levels of 1.75 mmol/L are probably indicated in this setting. Difficulties in determining the ideal dialysate Ca occur because of the complex pathophysiology of bone and mineral metabolism in HD patients and there needs to be a balance between dialysis prescription and other treatment modalities. To optimize management of the abnormal Ca balance, other aspects of this disorder need to be more fully clarified and, with evolving medications for phosphate control and treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism, as well as the emergence of a multitude of different HD regimes, further studies are required to make definitive recommendations. At present, we need to maintain flexibility with HD treatments and so dialysate Ca needs to be individualized to meet the specific requirements of patients by optimizing management of renal bone disease and simultaneously reducing metastatic calcification and cardiovascular disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations75
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis InternationalSame topicParathyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207