MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114567553 · doi:10.5539/ach.v6n2p227

Integration of Isan Traditional Knowledge in the Holistic Health Treatment of Postpartum Mothers

2014· article· en· W2114567553 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chontira Rubngam, Kosit Phaengsoi, Thaksina Krairach

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Culture and History · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSoutheast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMassagePostpartum periodInheritance (genetic algorithm)Health careQualitative researchNursingWork (physics)PsychologyMedicineAlternative medicineSociologyPregnancyEconomic growthSocial scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a qualitative cultural research into the traditional knowledge used by Northeastern Thai communities to care for mothers during the postpartum period. The research objectives were to study the background, current conditions and problems with the integration of Isan traditional knowledge in the holistic health treatment of postpartum mothers in order to outline an overview of the integration process. Following investigation into nine communities in Northeastern Thailand, it was found that three prominent forms of treatment are adopted. These are namely yu fai, tab maw gleau and herbal massage therapy. The traditional medicine has suffered in recent times through lack of inheritance and changing social conditions causing mothers to seek convenient treatment at local hospitals. There are complaints from these new generation mothers about aches, pains and tiredness that were rarely heard in the past. Thus integration of ancestral wisdom in holistic health care provides a perfect solution to the need for recuperation and the fast recovery of the postpartum mother so that she may take care of her child and return to work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.224

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Culture and HistorySame topicSoutheast Asian Sociopolitical StudiesFrench-language works237,207