Detection of Active and Silent States in Neocortical Neurons from the Field Potential Signal during Slow-Wave Sleep
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oscillations of the local field potentials (LFPs) or electroencephalogram (EEG) at frequencies below 1 Hz are a hallmark of the slow-wave sleep. However, the timing of the underlying cellular events, which is an alternation of active and silent states of thalamocortical network, can be assessed only approximately from the phase of slow waves. Is it possible to detect, using the LFP or EEG, the timing of each episode of cellular activity or silence? With simultaneous recordings of the LFP and intracellular activity of 2-3 neocortical cells, we show that high-gamma-range (20-100 Hz) components in the LFP have significantly higher power when cortical cells are in active states as compared with silent-state periods. Exploiting this difference we have developed a new method, which uses the LFP signal to detect episodes of activity and silence of neocortical neurons. The method allows robust, reliable, and precise detection of timing of each episode of activity and silence of the neocortical network. It works with both surface and depth EEG, and its performance is affected little by the EEG prefiltering during recording. These results open new perspectives for studying differential operation of neural networks during periods of activity and silence, which rapidly alternate on the subsecond scale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it