Electronic Structure of M(BH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>4</sub>, M = Zr, Hf, and U, by Variable Photon-Energy Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Density Functional Calculations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photoelectron (PE) spectra have been obtained for the M(BH(4))(4) (M = Zr, Hf and U) molecules in the 20-60 eV photon-energy range, and for M = U, also in the 90-120 eV region. Derived branching ratios (BR) and relative partial-photoionization cross sections (RPPICS) of the valence bands are used to confirm band assignment and demonstrate d-orbital covalency for all three compounds and f-orbital covalency for U(BH(4))(4). Core ionizations are identified and used to confirm resonance features in the RPPICS. The absorption spectrum of Zr(BH(4))(4) between 20 and 60 eV shows 4p absorption at 35.5 eV, coincident with the 4p-4d resonance in the RPPICS of the 1e and 2t(2) ionization bands of Zr(BH(4))(4). Less intense absorption bands at 32.5 and 33.8 eV correspond with shape resonance features in the 1a(1) and 1t(2) PE bands. The RPPICS of the f band of U(BH(4))(4) shows two strong resonant features between 95 and 120 eV. Direct photoemission of the 5f electrons from U(BH(4))(4) results only in the observation of the (2)F(5/2) ion state of [U(BH(4))(4)](+), but in the 5d-5f resonant region, a weak band corresponding to the (2)F(7/2) ion state is also observed. The splitting of the 1t(2) band of U(BH(4))(4) is attributed to a small contribution of U 6p semi-core electrons to this MO. Density functional calculations give a good estimate of the pattern of ionization energies, although the calculated absolute values are lower than the experimental values, the first IE by 0.5 eV for Zr(BH(4))(4) and Hf(BH(4))(4) and 1.0 eV for U(BH(4))(4). The MO compositions are in very good agreement with the deductions made from the BR and RPPICS analyses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".