MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2114621100 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2008.4633129

Accelerated time-domain modeling of microstrip based microwave circuit geometries on periodic substrates

2008· article· en· W2114621100 on OpenAlexafffund
Dongying Li, Costas D. Sarris

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicrostripMicrowaveAccelerationCoplanar waveguideFinite-difference time-domain methodElectronic engineeringSubstrate (aquarium)Microwave engineeringDispersion (optics)Computational electromagneticsTime domainComputer scienceElectronic circuitFrequency domainMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsOpticsElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringTelecommunicationsElectromagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advances in the design of electromagnetic bandgap and meta-material structures have opened new possibilities for substrate engineering to optimize the performance of microstrip or coplanar waveguide based integrated microwave circuits. Periodic substrates alone can be fully characterized through their dispersion analysis. On the other hand, modeling the interaction between metallic guides and such substrates usually involves lengthy simulations, because the resulting geometry is non-periodic. We propose a Finite-Difference Time-Domain based solution to this problem, which leads to significant acceleration of the relevant modeling process over broad bandwidths, without compromising accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides→French-language works237,207→