Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article montre comment les objets exposés dans les musées nationaux d’Afrique fonctionnent comme des supports de discours identitaires ou comme des moyens de reconnaissance et de revendications politiques. Le paradigme ethnique hérité de la période coloniale donne lieu à des aménagements et à des actualisations, qui visent à rendre compte à la fois de la diversité culturelle et de l’unité nationale des différents pays concernés. Les relations des visiteurs aux collections muséales sont parfois l’occasion de processus de subjectivation et d’appropriation, dont l’observation permet de décentrer les débats sur les publics des institutions patrimoniales. Sur la base d’exemples concernant les musées nationaux du Mali, du Niger, du Burkina Faso et du Sénégal, il s’agit ainsi de mieux comprendre pourquoi les usages politiques des objets de musée posent non seulement des problèmes muséographiques, mais aussi des questions plus importantes au sujet de la fabrique des communautés en Afrique de l’Ouest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".