Thermodynamic and Kinetic Origins of Au<sub>25</sub><sup>0</sup> Nanocluster Electrochemiluminescence
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au clusters with protecting organothiolate ligands and core diameters less than 2 nm are molecule-like structures, suitable for catalysis, optoelectronics and biology applications. The spectroscopy and electrochemistry of Au25(0) (Au25[(SCH2CH2Ph)18], SCH2CH2Ph = 2-phenylethanethiol) allowed us to construct a Latimer-type diagram for the first time, which revealed a rich photoelectrochemistry of the cluster and the unique relationship to its various oxidation states and corresponding excited states. The occurrence of cluster electrochemiluminescence (ECL) was examined in the presence of tri-n-propylamine (TPrA) as a co-reactant and was discovered to be in the near-infrared (NIR) region with peak wavelengths of 860, 865, and 960 nm, emitted by Au25(+*), Au25(0*), and Au25(-*), respectively. The light emissions, with an efficiency up to 103% relative to that of the efficient Ru(bpy)3(2+)/TPrA system, depended on the kinetics of the reactions between the electrogenerated TPrA radical and Au25(z) (z = 2+, 1+, 1-, and 2-) in the vicinity of the electrode or the bulk Au25(0). These thermodynamic and kinetic origins were further explored by means of spooling ECL and photoluminescence spectroscopy during a sweep of the potential or at a constant potential applied to the working electrode. NIR-ECL emissions of the cluster can be tuned in wavelength and intensity by adjusting the applied potential and TPrA concentration based on the above discoveries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it