MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114729870 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2008.4517668

Efficient 4D motion compensated lossless compression of dynamic volumetric medical image data

2008· article· en· W2114729870 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLossless compressionMotion compensationData compressionQuarter-pixel motionComputer visionInter frameArtificial intelligenceArithmetic codingContext-adaptive binary arithmetic codingReference frameAlgorithmFrame (networking)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic volumetric (four dimensional- 4D) medical images are typically huge in file size and require a vast amount of resources for storage and transmission purposes. In this paper, we propose an efficient lossless compression method for 4D medical images that is based on a multi-frame motion compensation process employing a 4D search, variable block- sizes and bi-directional prediction. Data redundancies are reduced by recursively applying multi-frame motion compensation in the spatial and temporal dimensions. The proposed method also uses a novel differential coding algorithm to reduce redundancies in motion vectors and a new context-based adaptive binary arithmetic coder (CABAC) for compression of the residual data. Performance evaluations on real medical images of varying modality resulted in lossless compression ratios of up to 16:1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it