Proanthocyanidin promotes free radical-scavenging activity in muscle tissues and plasma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study was carried out to clarify the effect of oral administration of proanthocyanidin (PA) on radical-scavenging activity in muscle and plasma using electron spin resonance (ESR). Eight-week-old male Wistar rats were orally administered with 3 doses per day of 1 mL of 0.05% (PA0.05), 0.5% (PA0.5) or 5% (PA5) PA for 1 week. Control animals received the same volume of distilled water. We also examined the effect of a single dose of 0.5% PA. Blood and muscle were collected from rats 1 h after the final administration. Scavenging activity against superoxide anions in the plasma and m. soleus (Sol), m. plantaris (Pla), deep and surface areas of the m. gastrocnemius (GasD and GasS, respectively) and myocardium (Hrt) was determined using ESR with the spin trap, 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide The scavenging activity in plasma for all groups given PA was 34%-44% higher than the control (p<0.05). The scavenging activity in Hrt, Sol and GasD increased by up to 50% compared with the control and tended to increase depending on the dose of PA (p<0.05). The impact of a single dose of PA was undetectable in all tissues. These results suggested that 1 week of oral PA improves the radical-scavenging activity in both plasma and muscle, especially in highly oxidative muscle. A single dose of PA was insufficient to improve the antioxidative capacity of muscle tissues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".