MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114773254 · doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3431

Technical note: An apparatus for catheterization of the lateral brain ventricle in Holstein cows

2010· article· en· W2114773254 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Björn Kuhla, O. Bellmann, Cornelia C. Metges

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological diseases and metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLeibniz-GemeinschaftLeibniz-Institut für NutztierbiologieUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsCannulaVentricleLateral ventriclesCerebral ventricleCatheterCerebrospinal fluidMedicineThird ventricleImplantAnatomyVentricular systemInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A stereotaxic apparatus for access to the lateral brain ventricle of Holstein cows was constructed. This apparatus permits topographic orientation on the head of an anesthetized cow that has been placed in right lateral recumbency. After assessing the XY-plane in parallel to the frontal bone, correct coordinates in reference to the skullcap were adjusted. The lateral brain ventricles were accessed by drilling holes perpendicular to the XY-plane. The subsequent surgical implant of a tailor-made cannula guide enabled the repeatable placement of a catheter. This permanent catheter allowed the frequent withdrawal of cerebrospinal fluid from and injections into cerebral ventricles of nonanesthetized dairy cows. This method is critical for elucidating the role of central hormones, metabolites, and electrolytes in the regulation of diverse physiological processes and for the study of neuropathological disorders in cows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicNeurological diseases and metabolismFrench-language works237,207