MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114798828 · doi:10.1109/isit.2009.5205778

A computation approach to the minimum total rate problem of causal video coding

2009· article· en· W2114798828 on OpenAlexaff
En‐hui Yang, Lin Zheng, Zhen Zhang, Dake He

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsBlackberry (Canada)University of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrame (networking)Computer scienceCoding (social sciences)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsStatisticsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Causal video coding is considered from an information theoretic point of view, where video source frames X1, X2, ? ? ? XNare encoded in a frame by frame manner, the encoder for each frame Xk, k = 1, ? ? ?, N, can use all previous frames and all previous encoded frames while the corresponding decoder can use only all previous encoded frames, and each frame Xkitself is modeled as a source Xk= {Xk(i)}i=1?. A novel computation approach is proposed to analytically characterize and numerically compute the minimum total rate Rc(D1, ? ? ?, DN) required to achieve a given distortion (quality) level D1, ? ? ?, DN? 0. Specifically, we first show that for jointly stationary ergodic sources X1, X2, ? ? ?, XN, Rc(D1, ? ? ?, DN) is equal to the infimum of the nthorder total rate distortion function Rc,n(D1, ? ? ?, DN) over all n, where Rc,n(D1, ? ? ?, DN) itself is given by the minimum of an information quantity over a set of auxiliary random variables. We then present an iterative algorithm for computing Rc,n(D1, ? ? ?, DN) and demonstrate the convergence of the algorithm to the global minimum. The global convergence of the algorithm further enables us to establish a single-letter characterization of Rc(D1, ? ? ?, DN) in a novel way when the N sources are an independent and identically distributed vector source. Deep insights from the algorithm are also gained regarding how each frame should be encoded in order to achieve Rc(D1, ? ? ?, DN); it is demonstrated by example that Rc(D1, ? ? ?, DN) is in general much smaller than the total rate offered by the traditional greedy coding method by which each frame is encoded in a local optimum manner based on all information available to the encoder of the frame. In addition, a tight achievable rate distortion region is also derived.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207