MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114818130 · doi:10.1149/1.1790533

Study of the Electrochemical Performance of Sputtered Si[sub 1−x]Sn[sub x] Films

2004· article· en· W2114818130 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor materials and interfaces
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmorphous solidElectrochemistryLithium (medication)Materials scienceHomogeneousSputteringComposition (language)Sputter depositionChemical engineeringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Range (aeronautics)Thin filmChemistryElectrodeCrystallographyNanotechnologyComposite materialPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amorphous alloys of Si and Sn exhibit large specific and volumetric capacities when cycled electrochemically vs. lithium. Combinatorial films of in the range have been prepared by magnetron sputtering. These films have been analyzed for structure, composition, and electrochemical performance. The composition range was chosen to ensure that the films would be amorphous. No sharp peaks are seen in the cyclic voltammograms of these films, indicating homogeneous insertion of lithium. Reversible capacities as high as 3500 mAh/g have been attained and capacity retention is generally good. There appears to be no correlation between composition and capacity retention in the range in © 2004 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it