MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114823997

A SURVEY OF ONLINE PURCHASING DECISION FACTORS AND SHOPPING AND PURCHASING BEHAVIORS OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

2006· article· en· W2114823997 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hyo‐Joo Han, Joseph Bullington, Tom Case

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Association for Information Systems · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPurchasingQuarter (Canadian coin)AdvertisingBusinessMarketingCensusPopulationPurchasing decisionConsumer behaviourGeographySociologyDemography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shopping and purchasing on retailers’ websites continues to expand. According to ACNielsen’s 2005 report, more than one tenth of the world population (627 million) have shopped online, and more than half of them have shopped (over 325 million) online within a month of the report’s release (ACNielsen, 2005). Compared to the third quarter 2004, the third quarter of 2005 showed a 26.7% increase in online retail sales in the U.S., generating $22.3 billion for online merchants (U.S. Census Bureau, 2005). Marketers and researchers have verified that university students are one of the most “wired” demographic groups of online users and continue to investigate the characteristics of shopping/purchasing behaviors among these students. The aim of this investigation is to further examine factors that drive university students’ online shopping and purchasing decisions, and the types of items they shop for and purchase online.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Association for Information SystemsSame topicConsumer Market Behavior and PricingFrench-language works237,207