A study of the relationships of interactions between Asp-201, Na<sup>+</sup> or K<sup>+</sup>, and galactosyl C6 hydroxyl and their effects on binding and reactivity of β-galactosidase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interactions between Na+ (and K+) and Asp-201 of beta-galactosidase were studied. Analysis of the changes in Km and Vmax showed that the Kd for Na+ of wild type beta-galactosidase (0.36 +/- 0.09 mM) was about 10x lower than for K+ (3.9 +/- 0.6 mM). The difference is probably because of the size and other physical properties of the ions and the binding pocket. Decreases of Km as functions of Na+ and K+ for oNPG and pNPG and decreases of the Ki of both shallow and deep mode inhibitors were similar, whereas the Km and Ki of substrates and inhibitors without C6 hydroxyls remained constant. Thus, Na+ and K+ are important for binding galactosyl moieties via the C6 hydroxyl throughout catalysis. Na+ and K+ had lesser effects on the Vmax. The Vmax of pNPF and pNPA (substrates that lack a C6 hydroxyl) did not change upon addition of Na+ or K+, showing that the catalytic effects are also mediated via the C6 hydroxyl. Arrhenius plots indicated that Na+, but not K+, caused k3 (degalactosylation) to increase. Na+ also caused the k2 (galactosylation) with oNPG, but not with pNPG, to increase. In contrast, K+ caused the k2 values with both oNPG and pNPG to increase. Na+ and K+ mainly altered the entropies of activation of k2 and k3 with only small effects on the enthalpies of activation. This strongly suggests that only the positioning of the substrate, transition states, and covalent intermediate are altered by Na+ and K+. Further evidence that positioning is important was that substitution of Asp-201 with a Glu caused the Km and Ki values to increase significantly. In addition, the Kd values for Na+ or K+ were 5 to 8 fold higher. The negative charge of Asp-201 was shown to be vital for Na+ and K+ binding. Large amounts of Na+ or K+ had no effect on the very large Km and Ki values of D201N-beta-galactosidase and the Vmax values changed minimally and in a linear rather than hyperbolic way. D201F-beta-galactosidase, with a very bulky hydrophobic side chain in place of Asp, essentially obliterated all binding and catalysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".