MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114861103 · doi:10.1109/plasma.2009.5227388

Comparison of Kα x-ray source from different metal targets using Sub-mJ kilohertz femto-second laser pulses

2009· article· en· W2114861103 on OpenAlexaff
H. F. Tiedje, Ying Y. Tsui, R. Fedosejevs, J. A. Chakera

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaserOpticsPhysicsFull width at half maximumSpectrometerDetectorSpectral lineWavelengthEmission spectrumMaterials scienceAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. We have developed an efficient Cu Kalpha X-ray source produced by a commercial kilohertz fs laser system. The source has a high X-ray conversion efficiency of 4x10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-5</sup> into Cu Kalpha line emission at 8.05 keV. The microplasma X-ray source is produced by focusing 260 muJ laser pulses of 130 fs (FWHM) on a moving Cu-wire target. The source has a size of < 10 mum as measured by a knife edge technique and is expected to have a short temporal duration on the order of a picosecond. Recently we have extended the operation of the source to new wavelengths by using steel wire and silver coated copper wire targets. The Fe and Ag Kalpha line emission is at 6.4 keV and 22.2 keV respectively. The emission energy and spectra at these new photon energies has been characterized using three different detector systems which include a filtered PIN diode detector, pulse height spectrometer using a CdTe detector along with multichannel analyzer and a single hit CCD camera used in pulse height analysis mode. The conversion efficiencies and spectra will be presented at these new wavelengths and compared to scaling laws for expected conversion efficiency from the energetic laser-produced electrons into X-rays. An average X-ray photon flux of > 109 ph/sr/s is achieved and the emission provides sufficient spatial coherence and intensity for applications such as phase contrast imaging of biological samples or testing of X-ray microscope components. It is expected that this compact source can be developed into a durable low cost operating system for time resolved pulse probe experiments, phase contrast imaging of biological specimens and testing of X-ray optics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesFrench-language works237,207