DE LA IDEA COMO ORIGEN A LA CULTURA COMO MEDIADORA. LA HISTORIA INTELECTUAL ALREDEDOR DE LAS INDEPENDENCIAS HISPANOAMERICANAS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El articulo propone una revision historiografica de la historia intelectual, en torno a las independencias hispanoamericanas, atendiendo a las transformaciones paralelas del tipo de historia y los presupuestos teoricos e instrumentos metodologicos en que estos se basan, ocurridos desde los sesenta: de la historia patria basada en la historia de las ideas romantica, a las historias de los lenguajes politicos, conceptual o de la cultura politica, basadas en la etnologia o los giros linguisticos e iconicos. Repasa la produccion que las entiende como parte de las revoluciones del mundo atlantico, la que evalua la influencia de las reformas borbonicas y el colapso del imperio. Estudia despues la literatura sobre la relacion de la independencia con el patriotismo criollo, la Ilustracion, el jusnaturalismo, la legislacion de Indias y las Partidas, el liberalismo, el cambio de paradigma introducido por el republicanismo y las ideas de los indigenas. El articulo cuestiona, a traves de esta estructura, que sigue los tipos ideales de los corpus ideologicos, asunciones basicas de la historia de las ideas politicas tradicional y muestra la necesidad de los nuevos acercamientos historicos para salvar las deficiencias de aquella.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".