MR Spectroscopy of the Fetal Brain: Is It Possible without Sedation?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The quality of spectroscopic studies may be limited because of unrestricted fetal movement. Sedation is recommended to avoid motion artefacts. However, sedation involves side effects. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and quality of brain (1)H-MR spectroscopy in unsedated fetuses and to evaluate whether quality is dependent on the type of spectra, fetal presentation, GA, and/or fetal pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five single-voxel spectroscopic studies of the fetal brain, performed at gestational weeks 19-38 at 1.5T, were evaluated retrospectively. A PRESS (TE = 144 or 35 ms) was used. Fetal presentation, GA, and kind of pathology were recorded. The quality of the spectra was assessed by reviewing the spectral appearance (line width, signal-to-noise) of the creatine resonance obtained relative to concentrations (ratios-to-creatine) of choline, myo-inositol, and NAA. RESULTS: Of 75 studies, 50 (66.6%) were rated as readable: short TE = 17/50 (34%), long TE = 33/50 (66%), cephalic presentation in 36/50 (72%) studies, breech in 10/50 (20%) studies, and "other" presentation in 4/50 (8%) studies (mean GA, 31.0 weeks). Twenty-eight of 50 fetuses (56%) showed normal development (short TE = 12/28, long TE = 16/28), and 22/50 (44%) showed pathology. Of the 75 studies, 25 (33.3%) were not readable: short TE = 14/25 (56%), long TE = 11/25 (44%), cephalic presentation in 20/25 (80%) studies, breech in 4/25 (16%) studies, and other presentation in 1 study (4%) (mean GA, 30.1 week). Thirteen of 25 fetuses (52%) showed normal development; 12/25 (48%) showed pathology. Statistical analysis revealed no impact of the different parameters on the quality of spectra. CONCLUSIONS: Single-voxel spectroscopy can be performed in approximately two-thirds of unsedated fetuses, regardless of the type of spectra, fetal presentation, GA, and pathology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".