Investigation of the Electromagnetic Interference Threat Posed by a Wireless Network Inside a Passenger Aircraft
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed an incisive push to allow the use of wireless networks inside passenger aircraft. Research was recently conducted to investigate the internal electromagnetic (EM) environment excited by a wireless network inside a passenger aircraft to provide quantification of the ensuing EM interference threat. An airbus A319 EM model was developed and validated using experimental data and analytical techniques. The validated model was applied to the investigation of an 800 MHz cellular network. The peak electric field strength inside each of the A319 EM models examined was much less than the most severe RTCA/DO-160D radiated susceptibility test levels. The current coupled to a cable running along the length of the fuselage was much less than the minimum operating parameters of an extremely sensitive avionic system (e.g., strain sensor). The results obtained help to quantify and reinforce the conclusion of the major research efforts that the likelihood of interference with flight critical systems is low. The model presented herein can be easily adapted to study EM propagation for various types of wireless network and aircraft configurations, and the modeling approach employed could be of potential use in modeling other large, complex structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it