MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114930162 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2007.4352738

Longitudinal, Regional and Deformation-Specific Corpus Callosum Shape Analysis for Multiple Sclerosis

2007· article· en· W2114930162 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShape analysis (program analysis)Principal component analysisPattern recognition (psychology)Corpus callosumRepresentation (politics)Deformation (meteorology)Boundary (topology)Heat kernel signatureArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMathematicsActive shape modelAnatomyGeologyMathematical analysisMedicineSegmentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The corpus callosum (CC) is an anatomical structure which connects the two brain hemispheres. Neurological diseases can cause atrophy of the CC resulting in a change in its size and shape. The measurement and analysis of this change is one of the goals of clinical research. We perform statistical analysis of the shape of the CC extracted from MR brain scans of a group of multiple sclerosis patients undergoing a longitudinal (serial) study. In contrast to the classical boundary-based, global shape variability measures, e.g. principal component analysis (PCA) of CC boundary vertices, we perform a deformation-specific PCA for analyzing the global and regional shape of the CC. This deformation-specific PCA is based on a medial-based shape representation. The adopted shape representation describes shape variability in terms of intuitive deformations (e.g. bending, stretching and thickness). We present qualitative and quantitative results for 412 MR images of the CC. We show that our method is successful in identifying and quantifying the effect of each type of deformation on the shape variability of the CC. In addition to analyzing the spatial shape variability in the CC, we explore shape changes as the disease progresses. Our method allows the exploration of the shape variability quantitatively (e.g. the amount of variance explained by a particular principal mode of shape variation) as well as in a qualitative visual manner (e.g. by visualizing, say, the 2nd principal mode of shape variation due to bending at the 4th sub-region of the CC) which is useful for developing an intuitive understanding of the effects of MS on the CC shape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it