MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114952962 · doi:10.1109/tie.2011.2162715

Three-Phase Cascaded Delayed Signal Cancellation PLL for Fast Selective Harmonic Detection

2011· article· en· W2114952962 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase-locked loopHarmonicsHarmonicCompensation (psychology)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)SIGNAL (programming language)Transient (computer programming)Harmonic analysisSensitivity (control systems)Detection theoryEngineeringDetectorVoltageTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringPhase noiseAcousticsPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fast and accurate selective harmonic detection has crucial value for many power system harmonic compensation systems. The existing detection methods are known to have a few drawbacks, such as long delay time, sensitivity to grid frequency variation, and difficulty to achieve zero steady-state error. In order to overcome these drawbacks, this paper proposes a selective harmonic detection system based on the three-phase cascaded delayed signal cancellation phase-locked loop. The system can be flexibly configured to detect any individual harmonic from the source with various background harmonics. It also features very short transient and excellent adaptability under small and considerable frequency variations, as verified by comprehensive experimental results. Finally, this paper provides guidance on how to tailor the detection system for different applications and a solution to address the practical implementation issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it