MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114961555 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs250

Impact of resting heart rate on mortality, disability and cognitive decline in patients after ischaemic stroke

2012· article· en· W2114961555 on OpenAlexaff
M. Böhm, Lydia D. Foster, Florian Custodis, Ulrich Laufs, Ralph L. Sacco, Philip M. Bath, Salim Yusuf, Hans‐Christoph Diener

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart rate and cardiovascular health
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMedicineRESTING HEART RATEStroke (engine)CardiologyIschaemic strokeInternal medicineCognitive declineHeart rateCognitionGerontologyPhysical therapyPsychiatryDementiaBlood pressureIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Recurrent stroke is a frequent and disabling event. A high heart rate is associated with cardiovascular outcomes. We investigated the effects of the resting heart rate on cardiovascular and neurological outcomes after recurrent stroke in the high-risk population of the PRoFESS study. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 20,165 patients after ischaemic stroke (mean age 66.1, SD 8.6 years) assigned to the treatment arms of the PRoFESS trial were pooled divided by quintiles of the baseline heart rate and analysed according to cardiovascular and functional outcomes after stroke: recurrent stroke and major cardiovascular outcomes such as stroke, myocardial infarction, and worsening or new-onset heart failure as well as death from cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes. Pre-defined endpoints were disability after a recurrent stroke, assessed with the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and the Barthel index at 3 months, and cognitive function, assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score at 4 weeks after randomization and at the penultimate visit. Patients in the two highest quintiles of heart rate (77-82 and >82 b.p.m.) were at a higher risk for total death [hazard ratio (HR) 1.42, 95% CI 1.19-1.69 and HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.48-2.06, P < 0.0001] compared with the lowest quintile. Similar results were observed for vascular death [71-≤76 b.p.m., HR 1.39 (1.11-1.74), P < 0.0001] and non-vascular death [from >82 b.p.m., HR 1.66 (1.29-2.13), P = 0.0016]. Myocardial infarction (P = 0.7084) and recurrent stroke (P = 0.1379) were not significantly associated with the baseline heart rate. Hazard ratios were adjusted to multiple confounders including the baseline blood pressure. In the group of patients with a recurrent stroke, an association of a lower heart rate to better outcomes was measured with the Barthel index across all heart rate groups. In addition, there was a significant association of the baseline heart rate to the occurrence of significant cognitive decline according to an MMSE score ≤24 points at 1 month and at the penultimate visit or a decline of ≥2 points between these two time periods. Better independence score at a low heart rate were observed. CONCLUSION: The heart rate is a risk indicator for mortality in patients with stroke and, importantly, a low heart rate is associated with a better functional outcome and less cognitive decline after an ischaemic stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NTC00153062.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations116
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicHeart rate and cardiovascular healthFrench-language works237,207