MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115013724 · doi:10.1021/jp8053197

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Spectroscopy Studies of Individual Lander Molecules Anchored on a Copper Oxide Nanotemplate

2008· article· en· W2115013724 on OpenAlexaff
Yoshitaka Naitoh, Federico Rosei, André Gourdon, Erik Lægsgaard, I. Stensgaard, Christian Joachim, Flemming Besenbacher

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSurface Chemistry and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScanning tunneling microscopeScanning tunneling spectroscopySpectroscopyMoleculeHOMO/LUMOChemistryCopperQuantum tunnellingOxideMaterials scienceCrystallographyNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By means of scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS), and current image tunneling spectroscopy (CITS), we have studied the electronic properties of individual “Lander” molecules anchored on a nanopatterned Cu(110) surface. To hinder surface diffusion during STM and STS imaging and spectroscopy studies at room temperature, the molecules are immobilized in the troughs of the Cu−O nanotemplate which forms on the Cu(110) surface by exposure to oxygen at high temperature. STS spectra extracted from CITS images reveal no lateral dependency over the molecules, which indicates that the electronic features above the center of the molecules as well as above the four spacer legs are very similar. An electronic gap of ∼2.2 eV was determined from the d I /d V spectra, which is tentatively ascribed to the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO)−lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) gap of the Lander molecules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicSurface Chemistry and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207