MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115142822 · doi:10.1177/0021140009360497

Toward a Wider Hospitality: Rethinking Love of Neighbour in Religions of the Book

2010· article· en· W2115142822 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIrish Theological Quarterly · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHospitalityBlessingSociologyReciprocity (cultural anthropology)JudaismAestheticsDatabase transactionEpistemologyPhilosophyLawTheologySocial sciencePolitical scienceTourism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article argues that because hospitality—the gesture of welcoming the stranger—is a way of expressing the love found in Jewish, Christian, and Muslim traditions, it can provide a pivotal point from which a shared ethic of reciprocity can emerge. Hospitality is a bestowal of welcome that opens toward another as loved by God. But in the transaction a strange reversal occurs. The host who initially offers a gift to the guest ends up becoming blessed by the guest, receiving the presence of God. As boundaries are crossed, blessing leads to blessing in mutually enriching ways. Exploring this dynamic opens up fresh possibilities for understanding how the love of God is tied inseparably to the love of neighbour. It also helps address the collaborative vision recently expressed by Muslim leaders in A Common Word, for the praxis of hospitality holds out the promise of cultivating interfaith vistas of justice, reconciliation, and peace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it