MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115191121 · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001448

Grand Challenges: Integrating Mental Health Services into Priority Health Care Platforms

2013· article· en· W2115191121 on OpenAlexaff
Vikram Patel, Gary S. Belkin, Arun Chockalingam, Janice L. Cooper, Shekhar Saxena, Jürgen Unützer

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthWellcome TrustSanofi
KeywordsMental healthPerspective (graphical)Health careGrand ChallengesMental health careMedicineNursingEngineering ethicsPublic relationsComputer sciencePolitical scienceEngineeringPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is one article in a five-part series providing a global perspective on integrating mental health.The Policy Forum allows health policy makers around the world to discuss challenges and opportunities for improving health care in their societies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.041
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.058
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0410.058
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.008
Scholarly communication0.0190.025
Open science0.0060.029
Research integrity0.0220.028
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations364
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS MedicineSame topicMental Health Treatment and AccessFrench-language works237,207