MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115194774 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2003.822778

An Analytical Equation for the Oscillation Frequency of High-Frequency Ring Oscillators

2004· article· en· W2115194774 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOscillation (cell signaling)Parasitic extractionRing (chemistry)Ring oscillatorPhysicsRange (aeronautics)Control theory (sociology)MathematicsMathematical analysisCMOSMaterials scienceComputer scienceOptoelectronicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analytical equation for the oscillation frequency of a ring oscillator is derived. The derivation is done using a novel method which does not need to find an expression for the delay of each stage. The resulting equation includes the effect of time-varying parasitics. It also includes the effect of the gate resistance, which has a large effect on the oscillation frequency at high frequencies. Measurement results of ring oscillators fabricated in a 0.18-/spl mu/m CMOS process show that the resulting equation has an average error of 8% over a large range of parameter variations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.491

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it