MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115208799 · doi:10.1109/wse.2001.988793

Towards a better understanding of Web applications

2001· article· en· W2115208799 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb Applications and Data Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReuseArchitectureWeb applicationWeb modelingWorld Wide WebParsingWeb APISoftware engineeringSet (abstract data type)Web serviceWeb developmentWeb designProgramming languageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a framework to recover the architecture of Web applications. Developers can visualize and navigate the recovered, architecture. Furthermore, they can analyze the architecture to gain a better understanding of their Web application. The Portable Bookshelf (PBS) environment combines much of the knowledge and techniques developed over the last decade in program understanding. It has been used to recover the design of large applications such as Linux, Apache and Mozilla. The paper describes the reuse and extension of the capabilities of PBS to support the design recovery of Web applications. We developed a set of tools capable of parsing and extracting relations between the components of Web applications. Also, we modified PBS's visualizer to handle the heterogenous nature of the Web.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWeb Applications and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207