MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115234803 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2002.1026822

Mine tailings characterization using PROBE data (preliminary results)

2003· article· en· W2115234803 on OpenAlexaffabout
Min-shuai Shang, K. Staenz, Josée Lévesque, Philip J. Howarth, Bill Morris, Lisa Lanteigne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of WaterlooNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTailingsAcid mine drainageEndmemberHyperspectral imagingMining engineeringLand reclamationCopper mineGeologyCharacterization (materials science)Environmental scienceRemote sensingCopperEnvironmental chemistryChemistryArchaeologyGeographyMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acid mine drainage (AMD), caused by mine tailings, poses an environmental threat. AMD control is a major challenge facing the mining industries worldwide. An important initial step towards the reclamation of mine tailings sites is to identify the presence of sulphide-rich minerals and their spatial distribution. This study investigated the potential of hyperspectral PROBE data for mine tailings characterization over the Copper Cliff's tailings site in northern Ontario, Canada. The results indicated that PROBE data could provide information on locating oxidation zonations of the tailings. More importantly, it revealed that library mineral spectra could replace the scene-derived endmember spectra to unmix the PROBE image.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207