MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115248915 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2012.2195055

Decision Feedback Equalizer Architectures With Multiple Continuous-Time Infinite Impulse Response Filters

2012· article· en· W2115248915 on OpenAlexaff
Shayan Shahramian, Hemesh Yasotharan, Anthony Chan Carusone

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfinite impulse responseBackplaneJitterChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringEqualizerFinite impulse responseIntersymbol interferenceBit error rateImpulse (physics)Digital filterAlgorithmEngineeringBandwidth (computing)Computer hardwareTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Decision feedback equalizer (DFE) architectures with varying numbers of discrete-time taps and continuous-time infinite impulse response (IIR) filters are compared for use in typical wireline channels. In each case, the DFE coefficients are optimized to minimize a cost function that equally weights both jitter and vertical eye opening. Even when some reflections are present (e.g., backplane channels) continuous-time IIR taps can be effective if their filter coefficients are properly optimized. Using a DFE architecture with only two IIR filters provides adequate results for both a 26-dB loss coax cable and a 16" FR-4 backplane channel at 10 Gb/s while keeping the DFE complexity low. Furthermore, the implementation and experimental results of a DFE with multiple (three) IIR filters is reported. Fabricated in a 0.13 μm CMOS process, the DFE consumes 17.3 mW from a 1.2 V supply. A bit error rate (BER) of 10-12was achieved at a data rate of 3.7 Gb/s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express BriefsSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207