MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115259733 · doi:10.1080/j003v22n01_04

Toward a Flexible Framework for Understanding Spirituality

2008· article· en· W2115259733 on OpenAlexaff
Sharon Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueOccupational Therapy In Health Care · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpiritualityOccupational therapyOrder (exchange)Workplace spiritualityPsychologyEpistemologyPsychotherapistSociologyMedicineAlternative medicinePhilosophyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Occupational therapy and nursing literature share a common theoretical journey of the concept, spirituality. This paper draws on the nursing literature's theoretical progress in the area of spirituality in order to propose a theoretical framework for occupational therapy models. It is suggested that discourse analysis and the examination of personal and professional worldviews will contribute to theorizing of the concept of spirituality within the discipline of occupational therapy and that it is preferable to represent spirituality as a flexible framework rather than a fixed definition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.533
Threshold uncertainty score0.481

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.381
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOccupational Therapy In Health CareSame topicResilience and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207