MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115300778 · doi:10.1115/imece2008-66516

S-Rail Sled Testing of Rotary Draw Bent and Hydroformed Aluminum Tubes

2008· article· en· W2115300778 on OpenAlexaff
Robert R. Mayer, D. A. Oliveira, Michael J. Worswick

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydroformingTube (container)BendingWeldingBent molecular geometryStructural engineeringBend radiusBending momentAluminiumRADIUSMaterials scienceEngineeringComposite materialComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report provides detailed test results for the aluminum S-rail form & crash project. We considered the effect of rotary draw bending, and rotary draw bending plus hydroforming, and their effect on mean crush force, maximum crush force, and maximum bending moment for aluminum s-rails. The use of our sled test setup resulted in accurate, repeatable test results with no end plate welding. The R/D (center bend radius/tube diameter) used were 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5. Tubes were hydroformed from the circular shape into a square tube with rounded corners. Annealed tubes were used to isolate the forming effects to thickness changes alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigh-Velocity Impact and Material BehaviorFrench-language works237,207