MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Living Tree Constitutionalist Replies

2009· article· es· W2115301571 on OpenAlexaff
W. J. Waluchow

Bibliographic record

VenueProblema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho · 2009
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstitutionalismTree (set theory)Political scienceMathematicsLawCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Never lit er ary at tempt was more unfor tu nate than my Trea tise of Human Na ture. It fell dead-born from the press, with out reach ing such dis tinc tion, as even to ex cite a murmur among the zeal ots. 2 PROBLEMA Anua rio de Fi lo so fa y Teo ra del De re cho 3 1 I would like to thank Brian Burge-Hendrix for or ga niz ing the panel ses sion (IVR, Krakow, Po land, Au gust, 2007) at which most of the pa pers dis cussed in this re ply were first pre sented. I would also like to thank Imer Flores and Juan Vega for fa cil i tat ing their pub li ca tion in Problema.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProblema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del DerechoSame topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207