Socialization Factors Conducive to Social Work Students’ Gain in Competence
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Summary: Socialization experiences related to background and secondary education are likely to affect academic achievement in university education, according to extant theory and research. How these experiences affect Hong Kong social work students’ grade-point-average (GPA) and self-assessed gain in competence in social work is the focus of examination in the present study. It is argued that among the experiences, that of volunteering during secondary school is likely to benefit the student, because of value congruence between volunteering and social work education. • Findings: This effect bears out in a survey of social work undergraduates in Hong Kong. Another important finding is the absence of privilege accruing from the socioeconomic status of students’ parents. In contrast, some indicators of the status negatively affected the students’ grade-point-averages. • Applications : These findings favor the use of the applicant’s volunteering experience as an admission criterion for the social work education program in university.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it